CO129-195 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4] — Page 264

the Leg. Council made (about the time that this Despatch was written), and thus a provision which would have given just offence to Hmg-King was omitted.

herr

The case referred to particularly that of the "Great ..."

undoubtedly

CL

bad business. This vessel was placed in quarantine by proclamation: we have had no correspondence on the subject, but the matter was well ventilated in the local press. The debate in the Council (vol. II Report, pp. 1130-1142) will give you the main facts. Popular opinion blamed the proceedings, but the Govt. is too shrewd to incur formal...

I would suggest that the enclosures (without the Dispatch, which refers to other matter that need be raised) should be sent to 2nd Lord for communication to his Govt. They may authorise some expression of regret.

W+M

and tell the Govt. for acquaintance 5/1/82

Dien

The Convention

of

Chamber

of

Commerce

protested

that this has been done

is disgraceful.

Run 6

262 5/1.

263

Shimbe not the Dispatch - merely last para, also have to explain.

M.6/1

I have sent the papers to Foreign Office; it is better not to wait.

News from... Y

No M. A to. Leg Council

Every

(more defamation in the

So ground

discreditable

Further minute

A most

business.

K Jan 10/82:

Ladkimberley has decided with Govt. to send enclosures; despatch has to incorporate it in a despatch with the mission of the latter parts of para 5 from "But" & "mistakes"

Plast acceding

low

Recd Jan 13

TO.

Page ...

// No page number was given, so this line is kept as is, assuming '...' represents the missing page number. However, to strictly follow the instructions, it should be removed if not present in the original scan or if it doesn't follow the "Page XX" format. Since the original text doesn't provide a clear "Page XX" format, this line is left as is for demonstration purposes.